- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Who is man?
Stanford, Calif.,: Stanford University Press (1965)
Abstract
Or that the tragedy of man is due to the fact that he is a being who has forgotten the question: Who is Man?
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Who is Man? Draft of an Open and Imperative Anthropology. [REVIEW]Werner S. Nicklis - 1982 - Philosophy and History 15 (1):33-34.
Who is Man? - The Perennial Answer of Islam.Seyyed Hossein Nasr - 1968 - In Helen Hogg (ed.), Man and His World/Terres des Hommes: The Noranda Lectures, Expo 67/les Conferences Noranda/L'expo 67. University of Toronto Press.
From the Death to Rebirth of Religion: Evolution of Leszek Kołakowski’s Thought in the Context of the Question: “Who Is Man?”.Marek Sikora - 2021 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 69 (4):199-223.
The Eclipse of Humanity: Heschel’s Critique of Heidegger.Lawrence Perlman - 2016 - Boston: De Gruyter.
Grundzüge Philosophischer Anthropologie: Eine Kritische Problemanalyse.Werner Woschnak - 2022 - Verlag Karl Alber.
Adam mehalekh ba-ʻolam: śiḥot ʻim Avraham Yehoshuʻa Heshel = Man walks in the world: conversations with Abraham Joshua Heschel.Pinchas Peli (ed.) - 2019 - Rishon le-Tsiyon: Miśkal, hotsaʼah la-or mi-yesodan shel Yediʻot Aḥaronot ṿe-Sifre Ḥemed.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-09-15
Downloads
16 (#908,022)
6 months
1 (#1,719,665)
2009-09-15
Downloads
16 (#908,022)
6 months
1 (#1,719,665)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A philosophy of science for the twenty‐first century.Janet A. Kourany - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
Neosentimentalism and the valence of attitudes.Katie McShane - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):747-765.
The Importance of Feminist Critique for Contemporary Cell Biology.the Biology Group & Gender Study - 1988 - Hypatia 3 (1):61-76.
Awe and Wonder in Scientific Practice: Implications for the Relationship Between Science and Religion.Helen De Cruz - 2020 - Issues in Science and Theology: Nature – and Beyond.
Explaining and valuing: An exchange between theology and the human sciences.James M. Gustafson - 1995 - Zygon 30 (2):159-175.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-5pqs9 uwo