Philosophical Papers 39 (3):343-371 (2010)

Authors
Jules Holroyd
University of Sheffield
Abstract
It is not usually morally permissible to desire the suffering of another person, or to act so as to satisfy this desire; that is, to act with the aim of bringing about suffering. If the retributive emotions, and the retributive responses of which they are a part, are morally permitted or even required, we will need to see what is distinctive about them. One line of argument in this paper is for the conclusion that a retributive desire for the suffering of the wrong-doer, and the aim to bring this about, can (contra recent arguments from Hanna 2008) be morally justified. It has been suggested that by reflecting on the role of the retributive emotions in interpersonal relationships, and the alleged legitimacy of the aim for the suffering of the wrong-doer within them, support can be garnered for retributive practices of punishment by the state (Duff 1986 and 2001, Bennett 2002 and 2003). The conclusion of the second line of argument in the paper is that whilst the retributive responses can permissibly aim at suffering, the way in which this is so in interpersonal relationships cannot provide support for retributive state punishment.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/05568641.2010.538914
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Impartial Reason.Stephen L. Darwall - 1983 - Cornell University Press.
The Expressive Function of Punishment.Joel Feinberg - 1965 - The Monist 49 (3):397-423.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Moral Agency of Group Agents.Christopher Thompson - 2018 - Erkenntnis 83 (3):517-538.
Reactive Attitudes, Forgiveness, and the Second-Person Standpoint.Alexandra Couto - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1309-1323.
The Expressivist Account of Punishment, Retribution, and the Emotions.Peter Königs - 2013 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):1029-1047.
Bennett’s Expressive Justification of Punishment.Peter Chau - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (4):661-679.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.
Moore’s Moral Facts and the Gap in the Retributive Theory.Brian Rosebury - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):361-376.
Retributive Parsimony.Richard L. Lippke - 2009 - Res Publica 15 (4):377-395.
Punishment: Consequentialism.David Wood - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (6):455-469.
The Rise and Fall of the Mixed Theory of Punishment.Whitley Kaufman - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):37-57.
Emotions, Retribution, and Punishment.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):160-173.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-11-30

Total views
612 ( #10,466 of 2,438,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
15 ( #45,127 of 2,438,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes