In Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass. pp. 53-76 (2002)
This essay explores the reasons for thinking that Scanlon's contractualist principle serves merely as a ?spare wheel?, an element that spins along nicely but bears no real weight, because it presupposes too much of what it should be explaning. The ambitions and scope of Scanlon's contractualism are discussed, as is Scanlon's thesis that contracualism will assess candidate moral principles individually rather than as sets. The final third of the paper critizes Scanlon's account of fairness and his approach to cases where agents can save either one person or many people
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
A Deliberative Model of Contractualism.Nicholas Southwood - 2008 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (2):183-208.
A Contractualist Account of Promising.Michael Cholbi - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):475-91.
Contractualism and Our Duties to Nonhuman Animals.Matthew Talbert - 2006 - Environmental Ethics 28 (2):201-215.
Of Metaethics and Motivation: The Appeal of Contractualism.Pamela Hieronymi - 2011 - In R. Jay Wallace, Rahul Kumar & Samuel Richard Freeman (eds.), Reasons and Recognition: Essays on the Philosophy of T. M. Scanlon. Oxford University Press.
Contractualism, Reciprocity, Compensation.David Alm - 2008 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (3):1-23.
Scanlon and Reasons.Sarah Marshall - 2003 - In Matt Matravers (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass. pp. 13-32.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads54 ( #97,554 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,216 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?