Gizela Horvath
Partium Christian University, Oradea, Romania
Arthur C. Danto convincingly argued that works of art are not differentiated from common objects by aesthetic properties. With this he broke down the system of aestheticism, which discussed art as a sub-category of the aesthetic experience, looked for the universal, historically and culturally unconditioned significant form in works of art. At the same time, Danto’s theory can also be read as one considering the aesthetic point of view irrelevant for the essence of art. The paradigmatic starting point of Danto’s theory is Andy Warhol’s Brillo Box. However it was the Brillo Box that created the opportunity for the questioning of this anti-aesthetic consequence, both Andy Warhol, when he created the Brillo Box, as well as Arthur C. Danto, when he chose it to be the starting point of his art philosophy, were driven by aesthetic motives. This inconsistency can be resolved by accepting that common objects are “transfigured” in the framework of an art theory, while adding that from the moment they have transfigured into a work of art, their (new) aesthetic properties become substantial.
Keywords Brillo Box  Arthur C. Danto  aesthetic  contemporary art
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Artworld.Arthur Danto - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):571-584.
The Transfiguration of the Commonplace.Arthur C. Danto - 1974 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 33 (2):139-148.
A Future for Aesthetics.Arthur C. Danto - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 51 (2):271-277.
The Aesthetic Essence of Art.Richard Lind - 1992 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (2):117-129.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Recovery of the Aesthetic Center.Robert E. Wood - 1995 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 69:1-25.
Recovery and Epistemic Residue.Sven Ove Hansson - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (4):421-428.
Behind the Brillo Box.Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O’Connor - 2005 - The Philosophers' Magazine 29 (29):75-78.
Belief Contraction Without Recovery.Sven Ove Hansson - 1991 - Studia Logica 50 (2):251 - 260.
The Riddle of Aesthetic Principles.Vojko Strahovnik - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):189-208.
Aesthetic Essays.Malcolm Budd - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Aesthetic Testimony: What Can We Learn From Others About Beauty and Art?Aaron Meskin - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):65–91.
Aesthetic Terms, Metaphor, and the Nature of Aesthetic Properties.Rafael De Clercq - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (1):27–32.
Grounding Moralism: Moral Flaws and Aesthetic Properties. Smuts - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (4):34-53.
On the Logic of Theory Change: Contraction Without Recovery. [REVIEW]Eduardo L. Fermé - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):127-137.
Aesthetic Luck.Anna Christina Ribeiro - 2018 - The Monist 101 (1):99-113.


Added to PP index

Total views
254 ( #39,978 of 2,462,678 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #45,647 of 2,462,678 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes