Building A General Theory of Meta‐Argumentation

Metaphilosophy 48 (3):345-354 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article presents a critical analysis of the main modern approaches to the problem of meta-argumentation and suggests a method for developing a general conception of meta-argumentation. A set of theoretical-methodological difficulties along this path is revealed. Overcoming these aporias would constitute the main steps toward developing the body of a theory of meta-argumentation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,127

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fallacies of Meta-argumentation.Scott Aikin & John Casey - 2022 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 55 (4):360-385.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-25

Downloads
27 (#609,703)

6 months
1 (#1,516,603)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Discourse on Method.René Descartes - 1900 - The Monist 10:472.
Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant & Raymund Schmidt - 1924 - Annalen der Philosophie Und Philosophischen Kritik 4 (3):30-31.
Predicting novel facts.Michael R. Gardner - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (1):1-15.

View all 15 references / Add more references