A paradox for weak deontology

Utilitas 21 (4):464-477 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Deontological ethicists generally agree that there is a way of harming others such that it is wrong to harm others in that way for the sake of producing a comparable but greater benefit for others. Given plausible assumptions about this type of harm, this principle yields the paradoxical result that it may be wrong to do A, wrong to do B, but permissible to do (A and B).

Similar books and articles

Living without closure.Krista Lawlor - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):25-50.
The Demands of Deontology Are Not So Paradoxical.Judith Andre - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:407-410.
The paradox of deontology.Christopher McMahon - 1991 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 20 (4):350-377.
The Paradox of Deontology, Revisited.Ulrike Heuer - 2011 - In Mark Timmons (ed.), Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Deontology, Paradox, and Moral Evil.Richard Brook - 2007 - Social Theory and Practice 33 (3):431-440.
Deontology and defeat.Michael Bergmann - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
On the Paradox of Deontology.William H. Shaw - 1991 - Journal of Philosophical Research 16:393-406.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-13

Downloads
3,382 (#1,937)

6 months
365 (#5,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Huemer
University of Colorado, Boulder

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations