Can There be a Proof that an Unprovable Sentence of Arithmetic is True?

Dialectica 43 (43):289-292 (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Various authors of logic texts are cited who either suggest or explicitly state that the Gödel incompleteness result shows that some unprovable sentence of arithmetic is true. Against this, the paper argues that the matter is one of philosophical controversy, that it is not a mathematical or logical issue.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-23

Downloads
39 (#398,761)

6 months
3 (#1,208,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Philip Hugly
University of California, Berkeley (PhD)
Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Elementary logic.Benson Mates - 1972 - New York,: Oxford University Press.
Formal logic: its scope and limits.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1967 - Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Sets, Logic, and Axiomatic Theories.Alfons Borgers - 2003 - San Francisco, CA, USA: W.H. Freeman.
Introduction to symbolic logic.John L. Pollock - 1969 - New York,: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Understanding symbolic logic.Gerald J. Massey - 1970 - New York,: Harper & Row.

View all 6 references / Add more references