The Leibnizian-Newtonian Debates: Natural Philosophy and Social Psychology

British Journal for the History of Science 6 (4):343-377 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

By the time of the Leibniz-Clarke correspondence of 1716 the Newtonian and Leibnizian systems of natural philosophy had reached maturity. Each system consisted of different physical as well as metaphysical principles which, taken together, formed a world view. At the time of their famous debates, Leibniz at 70 and Newton at 74, the founders of two highly developed scientific philosophies, were struggling to establish and defend the ontological and mechanical bases of differing bodies of organized knowledge

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
21 (#733,267)

6 months
10 (#261,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The Edinburgh Phrenology Debate: 1803–1828.G. N. Cantor - 1975 - Annals of Science 32 (3):195-218.
Madame Du Ch'telet's Metaphysics and Mechanics.Carolyn Iltis - 1977 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 8 (1):29.
The show that never ends: perpetual motion in the early eighteenth century.Simon Schaffer - 1995 - British Journal for the History of Science 28 (2):157-189.
The Transmission of Science.R. G. A. Dolby - 1977 - History of Science 15 (1):1-43.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophical Papers and Letters.Martha Kneale - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (4):574.
From the closed world to the infinite universe.A. Koyré - 1957 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 148:101-102.
Concepts of Force.Max Jammer - 1959 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1):132-132.
Boyle's Conception of Nature.J. E. McGuire - 1972 - Journal of the History of Ideas 33 (4):523.

View all 12 references / Add more references