Is there a Need for Extension of Subsidiary Protection in the European Union Qualification Directive?


Abstract
The establishment of the Common European Asylum System by 2012 remains a key policy objective for the European Union. According to the Council of the European Union, the development of a Common Asylum Policy should be based on a full and inclusive application of the 1951 Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and other relevant international treaties. In the European Pact on Immigration and Asylum attention is brought to the persistence of wide disparities amongst Member States in the granting of protection and the form of protection granted. This is seen as one of the main problems to be addressed in building the CEAS. It is fairly obvious that existing divergences in policy have a substantial impact upon the aims of the CEAS. It can be assumed that the difference in governmental practices involving recognizing asylum seekers on refugee grounds or subsidiary protection grounds may be a substantial factor in the decision-making process on where to apply for international protection. The European Commission stressed the importance, during the second phase of the CEAS, of paying particular attention to subsidiary and other forms of protection
Keywords EU Qualification Directive  ES kvalifikavimo direktyva  subsidiary protection  international protection  laikina apsauga  asylum  asmenys  international human rights law  temporary protection  tarptautinė apsauga  prieglobstis  legal status of foreigners  pabėgėliai  tarptautinė žmogaus teisių teisė  užsieniečių teisinė padėtis  kuriems suteikta papildoma apsauga  papildoma apsauga  beneficiaries of subsidiary protection  refugees
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Asylum Legal Framework and Policy of the Slovak Republic.Lucia Hurná - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (4):1383-1405.
Lessons of the First EU Court of Justice Judgments in Asylum Cases.Lyra Jakulevičienė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (2):477-505.
The Refugee Qualification Problems in LGBT Asylum Cases.Laurynas Biekša - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (4):1555-1565.
Procedural Problems in LGBT Asylum Cases.Lyra Jakulevičienė, Laurynas Biekša & Eglė Samuchovaitė - 2012 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 19 (1):195-207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
11 ( #720,917 of 2,280,594 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #835,594 of 2,280,594 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature