Descriptions and discourse models

Linguistics and Philosophy 3 (3):371 - 393 (1979)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that mental models of discourse are key in any theory of the interpretation of definite descriptions. It considers both referential and attributive uses of such descriptions, in the sense introduced by Donnellan

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Erratum: Descriptions and Discourse Models.P. N. Johnson-Laird & A. Garnham - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1):157-157.
On Referring: Donnellan versus Strawson.Antonio Capuano - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (4):1091-1110.
Are “Attributive” Uses of Definite Descriptions Really Attributive?Ilhan Inan - 2006 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):7-13.
Wettstein on definite descriptions.William K. Blackburn - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (2):263 - 278.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
99 (#172,804)

6 months
14 (#252,725)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Peder Johnson
University of New Mexico
Alan Garnham
University of Sussex

References found in this work

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 2005 - Mind 114 (456):873 - 887.
Reference and definite descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.

View all 21 references / Add more references