Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task

Science 310 (5745):116-119 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A fundamental assumption of theories of decision-making is that we detect mismatches between intention and outcome, adjust our behavior in the face of error, and adapt to changing circumstances. Is this always the case? We investigated the relation between intention, choice, and introspection. Participants made choices between presented face pairs on the basis of attractiveness, while we covertly manipulated the relationship between choice and outcome that they experienced. Participants failed to notice conspicuous mismatches between their intended choice and the outcome they were presented with, while nevertheless offering introspectively derived reasons for why they chose the way they did. We call this effect choice blindness.

Similar books and articles

From Simon 's scissors for rationality to abc's adaptive toolbox.X. T. Wang - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):765-766.
Pragmatic Failure and the Attribution of Belief.Richard W. Field - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:133-143.
Settled objectives and rational constraints.Hugh J. McCann - 1991 - American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (1):25-36.
Intention detecting.Richard Holton - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):298-318.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
7,477 (#597)

6 months
318 (#6,588)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Petter Johansson
Lund University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references