Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief

Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):450-455 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The decision of the German regional court in Cologne on 26 June 2012 to prohibit the circumcision of minors is important insofar as it recognises the qualitative similarities between the practice and other prohibited invasive rites, such as female genital cutting. However, recognition of similarity poses serious questions with regard to liberal public policy, specifically with regard to the exceptionalist treatment demanded by certain circumcising groups. In this paper, I seek to advance egalitarian means of dealing with invasive rites which take seriously cultural diversity, minimise harm and place responsibility for the burdens and consequences of beliefs upon those who promote practices

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Female Genital Cutting : Who Defines Whose Culture as Unethical?Naomi Onsongo - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (2):105-123.
Criticising religious practices.Brian D. Earp - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:15-17.
Value judgment, harm, and religious liberty.A. M. Viens - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
33 (#473,035)

6 months
6 (#702,272)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?