South Park as Philosophy: Blasphemy, Mockery, and (Absolute?) Freedom of Speech

In The Palgrave Handbook of Popular Culture as Philosophy. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 633-672 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Perhaps no show has ever engaged in philosophy as much as South Park. Although it has made many philosophical arguments, this chapter will focus on the arguments South Park makes regarding censorship and freedom of speech, especially the ones made in the banned episodes “Cartoon Wars” (Part I and II), “200” and “201.” Does catering to terrorism create more? Should we respond to terrorism by doing more of what the terrorist want to forbid? When it comes to mockery, is everything fair game? How much should we be willing to sacrifice for freedom of speech? And how far should freedom of speech go? After a historical summary of South Park’s controversies, and by engaging with the works of many past philosophers (e.g., John Stuart Mill and Karl Popper) and contemporary ones (e.g., Geroge Letsas, Aaron James, and Brian Leiter), this chapter will answer these questions and more.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cartman Shrugged.Paul A. Cantor - 2013 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy: Respect My Philosophah! Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 175--193.
Respect My Religiositah!David Koepsell - 2013-08-26 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 95–107.
Freedom of speech in liberal and non-liberal traditions.Volker Kaul - 2022 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):460-472.
Freedom of speech in liberal and non-liberal traditions.Volker Kaul - 2022 - Sage Publications Ltd: Philosophy and Social Criticism 48 (4):460-472.
Flatulence and Philosophy.Willie Young - 2013-08-26 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 5–18.
now, Is That Really Blasphemy? Heretical Meaning And Belief.Peter Olen - 2008 - Florida Philosophical Review 8 (1):31-40.
Of art and blasphemy.Anthony Fisher & Hayden Ramsay - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):137-167.
Academic freedom: Its nature, extent and value.Robin Barrow - 2009 - British Journal of Educational Studies 57 (2):178-190.
Cartman Shrugged.Paul A. Cantor - 2013-08-26 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 175–193.
Juvenile Hijinks With Serious Subtext.David Valleau Curtis & Gerald J. Erion - 2013-08-26 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 131–142.
Speaking the Despicable: Blasphemy in Literature.Andreea Tereza Nitisor - 2007 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 6 (16):69-79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-03

Downloads
1 (#1,902,042)

6 months
1 (#1,472,961)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references