Testing the Doomsday Argument

Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (1):31-44 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Brandon Carter's anthropic principle reminds us that observers are most likely to find themselves in the spatiotemporal regions containing most of them. One should tend to prefer theories which make one's own observed spatiotemporal position fairly ordinary. This could much increase the estimated likelihood that our technological civilisation was not the very first in a universe which would include hugely many such civilisations. Similarly, which is the Carter‐Leslie ‘doomsday argument’, it could much increase the estimated likelihood that you and I are not in the earliest 0.01%, for instance, of all humans who will ever have lived—as we would be if the human race survived for long even at its present size, let alone if it colonised the galaxy. With the aid of thought‐experiments, the article defends this argument against many objections. Other thought‐experiments suggest, though, that the argument is weaker if the world is radically indeterministic. In this case, it perhaps indicates only that we should not be highly confident in humankind's long survival, because high confidence would be equivalent to saying that any indeterminism would be unlikely to be relevant.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
26 (#145,883)

6 months
4 (#1,635,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Observer‐relative chances and the doomsday argument.John Leslie - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (4):427 – 436.
A difficulty for Everett's many‐worlds theory.John Leslie - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (3):239 – 246.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Time and the anthropic principle.John Leslie - 1992 - Mind 101 (403):521-540.

Add more references