History, knowledge, and essence in the early Marx

Studies in Soviet Thought 25 (4):261-283 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

THE EARLY MARX'S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE DOES NOT INVOLVE THE ACCEPTANCE OF AN UNKNOWN THING-IN-ITSELF AND DOES NOT IMPLY THAT WE CAN ONLY KNOW OBJECTS AS THEY HAVE BEEN CONSTITUTED FOR-US. WE CAN KNOW THINGS AS THEY ARE IN-THEMSELVES. TO SHOW THIS, WE MUST ALSO SEE THAT THE OBJECT OF KNOWLEDGE IS BOTH CONSTITUTED AND THAT IT REFLECTS OR COPIES THINGS AS THEY ARE IN THEMSELVES.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Knowing how things might have been.Mark Jago - 2018 - Synthese (Suppl 8):1-19.
Knowing how things might have been.Mark Jago - 2018 - Synthese 198 (S8):1981-1999.
From Essence to Metaphysical Modality?Harold W. Noonan - 2020 - Axiomathes 32 (2):345-354.
Between the Bounds of experience and divine intuition: Kant's epistemic limits and Hegel's ambitions.James Kreines - 2007 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):306 – 334.
Reasoning with knowledge of things.Matt Duncan - 2023 - Philosophical Psychology 36 (2):270-291.
Knowing Essentials.Robert Sokolowski - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 47 (4):691 - 709.
Kantian Humility.Rae Langton - 1995 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Locke's Reply to the Skeptic.Shelley Weinberg - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):389-420.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
27 (#575,991)

6 months
8 (#506,524)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip J. Kain
Santa Clara University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references