Legal Progress Through Pragma-Dialectics? Prospects Beyond Analogy and E Contrario

Argumentation 19 (4):497-507 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pragma-dialectical approaches to legal argumentation seem to be rather different from traditional approaches appealing to standards of propositional logic. Pragma-dialectical analysis of arguments by analogy and e contrario seem to fall foul to the rigors of logical analysis, in which problems or even concepts of analogy and e contrario seem to disappear. The brunt of both types of special legal argumentation appears to be borne by often implicit general principles and an appeal to the system of the law as a whole. Still, pragma-dialectics and logical analysis of legal argument are best seen as fruitfully supplementing each other in ongoing research of ever evolving legal argument

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deductivism Within Pragma-Dialectics.Leo Groarke - 1999 - Argumentation 13 (1):1-16.
Pragma-dialectics and Beyond.Daniel Bonevac - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):451-459.
Does Arguing from Coherence Make Sense?Stefano Bertea - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):433-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-21

Downloads
72 (#216,970)

6 months
9 (#210,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Law’s Empire.Ronald Dworkin - 1986 - Harvard University Press.
Normative Systems.D. G. Londey - 1973 - Philosophical Quarterly 23 (92):280.
Legal Reasoning.Martin Philip Golding - 1983 - Alfred a Knopf.
Normative Systems.D. D. Todd - 1973 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (3):437-438.
The Interpretive Turn. [REVIEW]Ken Kress - 1987 - Ethics 97 (4):834-860.

View all 6 references / Add more references