Abstract

Despite considerable attention given in the literature to Martin Heidegger’s ideas of dwelling, space and spatiality, earth and world, the core issue of Heidegger’s “topology of being” (Topologie des Seins/Seyns), or what his topo- logical way of thinking means, oddly, remains enigmatic for many readers of Heidegger. It is peculiar that the following question is rarely raised: Was the question of place (Ort, Ortschaft) for Heidegger only a theme among many oth- ers, or rather does the topological thinking of being – the thinking of τόπος of λόγος but also the λόγος of τόπος – determine his entire philosophical trajectory? How could we recognize the ontological idea of place – the bounded openness of being where human dwelling takes place – and differentiate it from a narrow view of place as metaphorically imagined landscape, mathematically deter- mined point in calculable space, or politically defined geo-political location? Is there a way to distinguish, first, Heidegger’s nostalgia for the pre-industrial Swabian countryside from his entanglement with Nazism between the early 1930s and 40s, and then the latter from the philosophical idea of the reciprocal unity of τόπος and λόγος – the locality or “placefulness’ of being” (Örtlichkeit des Seins)?