The Paradox of the Buddhist Soldier

Contemporary Buddhism 22 (1-2):102-143 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT At first glance, a military life and practising Buddhism may seem like two pursuits at odds. Buddhism sets the moral bar very high and nowhere in its teachings can one find any evidence in support of violence, whether in word, thought or deed. One could therefore argue that Buddhism and the military are two strange bedfellows, and some may find it difficult to conceive of serving in the military whilst adhering to the ethos, values and standards of Buddhism. This article challenges this popular myth and resolves this apparent paradox between Buddhism and the military. By drawing on canonical Buddhist teachings as well as voices from the Sangha and Buddhist military practitioners, we demystify the ‘Buddhist soldier’ and clear common misconceptions regarding: the fundamental teachings of ahiṃsā, karma and skilful (kusala) action; Buddhist teachings being equated to pacifism; the duty of soldiers and the State to protect; soldiering as a ‘right livelihood’; and the karmic implications of military professions. Using international humanitarian law, the body of law regulating the conduct of war, as a natural reference point, we explore what guidance Buddhist teachings provide to soldiers and how they potentially can contribute towards reducing suffering in war, including through application in military training. Buddhism endorses the concept of maintaining disciplined, virtuous and skilled military forces to protect what is good. At all times one needs to aim at not causing suffering to others, but never at the expense of preventing even worse suffering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Buddhist Epistemology and the Liar Paradox.Szymon Bogacz - 2024 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 102 (1):206-220.
Engaging with the Paradoxes of Consequentialism.Gordon F. Davis - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 8:73-81.
Reconstructing early Buddhism.Roderick S. Bucknell - 2022 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
W ang Fuzhi’s Criticism of Buddhism and Its Limitations.Mingran Tan - 2018 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 17 (3):381-400.
Chan wai liu yun.Zaixuan Chen - 2007 - Beijing Shi: Zong jiao wen hua chu ban she.
Nalanda and Buddhism.R. Panth (ed.) - 2002 - Nalanda: Nava Nalanda Mahavihara.
Introductory debate in Tibetan Buddhism.Daniel Perdue - 1976 - Dharamshala, India: Library of Tibetan Works & Archives. Edited by Phur-Bu-Lcog Byams-Pa-Rgya-Mtsho.
Buddhism Under the T'ang.Stanley Weinstein - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
Buddhist thought and culture in India and Korea.Siddheswar Rameshwar Bhatt (ed.) - 2003 - New Delhi: Indian Council of Philosophical Research.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-15

Downloads
11 (#1,129,983)

6 months
6 (#509,125)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references