Owning up to Our Agendas: On the Role and Limits of Science in Debates about Embryos and Brain Death

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (1):58-76 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

”Merely fact-minded sciences make merely factminded people.”“ …the positivistic concept of science in our time is, historically speaking, a residual concept. It has dropped all the questions which had been considered under the now narrower, now broader concepts of metaphysics….all these ‘metaphysical’ questions, taken broadly – commonly called specifically philosophical questions – surpass the world understood as the universe of mere facts. They surpass it precisely as being questions with the idea of reason in mind. And they all claim a higher dignity than questions of fact, which are subordinated to them even in the order of inquiry. Positivism, in a manner of speaking, decapitates philosophy.”Edmund HusserlIn ethical literature associated with controversies at the beginning and end of human life, there is often a two-part structure: first, basic facts about the topic are presented in a more or less descriptive format, then there is the ethics or policy.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
10 (#1,221,414)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

George Khushf
University of South Carolina

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
Abandoning Informed Consent.Robert M. Veatch - 1995 - Hastings Center Report 25 (2):5-12.
The Endurance of the Mechanism: Vitalism Controversy.Hilde Hein - 1972 - Journal of the History of Biology 5 (1):159 - 188.

View all 17 references / Add more references