Abstract

The mark of a good volume of individual essays is that when brought together the collection is more interesting and evocative than any of the essays individually. Much of the work presented here is well worth reading on its own merits, such as Robert Neville’s reflections on the value of philosophical totality, Ivor Leclerc’s thoughts on the problems of the knowledge of nature, or Thomas Auxter’s reconception of the history of moral philosophy. Yet taken together all of the essays present a very well balanced estimation of the problems and potentials involved in the comparison of Hegel and Whitehead, as well as upon the value and purpose of oft maligned systematic philosophy.