A Conflict Between Some Semantic Conditions of Carmo and Jones for Contrary-to-Duty Obligations

Studia Logica 105 (1):173-178 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that Carmo and Jones’ condition 5 conflicts with the other conditions on their models for contrary-to-duty obligations. We then propose a resolution to the conflict.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-02

Downloads
15 (#975,816)

6 months
2 (#1,259,626)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
University of Hawaii

References found in this work

Counterfactuals and comparative possibility.David Lewis - 1973 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 2 (4):418-446.
Chisholm's Paradox and Conditional Oughts.Catharine Saint Croix & Richmond Thomason - 2014 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8554:192-207.

Add more references