Against reductive ethical naturalism

Philosophical Studies 176 (8):1991-2010 (2019)

Authors
Justin Klocksiem
New Mexico State University
Abstract
This paper raises an objection to two important arguments for reductive ethical naturalism. Reductive ethical naturalism is the view that ethical properties reduce to the properties countenanced by the natural and social sciences. The main arguments for reductionism in the literature hold that ethical properties reduce to natural properties by supervening on them, either because supervenience is alleged to guarantee identity via mutual entailment, or because non-reductive supervenience relations render the supervenient properties superfluous. After carefully characterizing naturalism and reductionism, we will present, explain, and raise objections against each of the main reductionist arguments: that supervenience does not support the claim that ethical properties and their subvenient natural properties are mutually entailing; that reductive views undermine the claim that ethical properties yield resemblance; and that supervenience does not entail that non-descriptive ethical properties are superfluous in the most fundamental sense.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-018-1107-6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,434
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Moral Problem.Michael Smith - 1994 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (1):125-126.
Ethics, Inventing Right and Wrong.J. L. Mackie - 1977 - Erkenntnis 18 (3):425-430.
Reason, Truth and History.Hilary Putnam - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 51 (4):692-694.

View all 44 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Hume’s Dictum and Metaethics.Victor Moberger - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Realist Ethical Naturalism for Ethical Non-Naturalists.Ryan Stringer - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (2):339-362.
The Price of Non-Reductive Moral Realism.Ralph Wedgwood - 1999 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (3):199-215.
Moral Discourse and Descriptive Properties.Brad Majors - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):475–494.
Moral Discourse and Descriptive Properties.Brad Majors - 2005 - Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):475 - 494.
Cornell Realism, Explanation, and Natural Properties.Luis R. G. Oliveira & Timothy Perrine - 2017 - European Journal of Philosophy 25 (2):1021-1038.
Supervenience and Neuroscience.Pete Mandik - 2011 - Synthese 180 (3):443 - 463.
Ethical Naturalism.James Andrew Ryan - 1996 - Dissertation, University of Miami
Why Naturalism?David Copp - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):179-200.
Kim's Supervenience Argument and the Nature of Total Realizers.Douglas Keaton - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):243-259.
The Ontological Status of Ethics.Bindu Madhok - 1991 - Dissertation, Brown University
Supervenience and Reductive Physicalism.Erhan Demircioglu - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (1):25-35.
Ethical Naturalism: Current Debates.Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.) - 2011 - Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-05-09

Total views
44 ( #199,063 of 2,280,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #57,842 of 2,280,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature