Deepened Monotheism. Philosophical Reasoning on the Trinity in Western Early Medieval and Classic Arabic Theology

Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 62 (2):233-264 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

SummaryChristian theologians can explain the Trinitarian faith today in dialogue with Islamic thinkers as “deepened monotheism”. Therefore it is important to widen the systematic-theological discourse in an ecumenical and transcultural perspective and to retrieve resources from Western and non-Western traditions of Trinitarian thought (I).In this paper I will first work out historically that the Trinitarian creed of Nicea and Constantinople was originally an ecumenical but non-Western creed (II). Afterwards, I investigate the philosophical-theological reflection on the Trinity by Anselm of Canterbury (1033–1109) in the context of early interreligious encounters in the Latin West. Based on biblical, augustinian and Greek sources, he developed an approach to understand the mystery of the Trinity by rational arguments as “deepened monotheism” (III). Then I will proceed to explore the philosophical-theological dialogues on the Trinity from the Arabic philosopher and Syrian-orthodox theologian Yaḥyā ibn ‘Adī (893–974). Much earlier he developed rational arguments for the Triunity of God with reference to Aristotle. Thereby he answers to anti-trinitarian arguments from Islamic thinkers like al-Kindī and al-Warrāq. He intends that the Trinitarian faith of Christian minorities can thereby be understood and tolerated by Islamic thinkers as rationally founded “deepened monotheism” (IV).In the end I will evaluate what these classics from the Western and non-western traditions of Trinitarian thought contribute to explicate the doctrine of the Trinity today in a pluralistic religious context as “deepened monotheism” (V).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Trinity Monotheism.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2003 - Philosophia Christi 5 (2):375 - 403.
Triads and trinity.John Gwyn Griffiths - 1996 - Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Trinity.Brian Hebblethwaite - 2005 - In Philosophical Theology and Christian Doctrine. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 75–90.
Sabellianism reconsidered.Harriet E. Baber - 2002 - Sophia 41 (2):1-18.
The Logical Problem of the Trinity.Beau Branson - 2014 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
Studies in the history of Arabic logic.Nicholas Rescher - 1964 - [Pittsburgh]: University of Pittsburgh Press.
The Trinity.Michael C. Rea - 2008 - In Thomas P. Flint & Michael Rea (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophical theology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 403--429.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-10-03

Downloads
13 (#1,040,014)

6 months
10 (#274,061)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

John Philoponus as a Source of Medieval Islamic and Jewish Proofs of Creation.Herbert A. Davidson - 1969 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 89 (2):357-391.

Add more references