Response to Comments

Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):118 - 121 (1956)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

2. To use the objective form, "X is the case," is to indicate prima facie that the above rules have been observed in making the assertion and that the hearer is expected to take this for granted. Otherwise, special qualifications are normally added which indicate that the speaker knows of special circumstances which may prevent the hearer from believing X or make him for some reason incapable of following the evidence for X.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,590

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Comments.Brand Blanshard Terrell & Irwin C. Lieb - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652-655.
Response to Comments.Richard Taylor - 1954 - Review of Metaphysics 7 (4):689 - 693.
Response to Comments.David Harrah - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (1):125 - 128.
Response to Comments.James F. Anderson - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (3):469 - 472.
Response to Comments.Francis V. Raab - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):130 - 131.
Response to Comments.Paul Weiss - 1955 - Review of Metaphysics 8 (4):682 - 684.
Response to Comments.Carl G. Hempel - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 5 (4):628 - 629.
Response to Comments.Donald Walhout - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):652 - 655.
Response to Comments.Newton P. Stallknecht - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 9 (3):481 - 484.
A Response to Comments.Andrew P. Ushenko - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):483 - 485.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
11 (#351,772)

6 months
1 (#1,912,481)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references