Rightness and reasons: A reply to Stecker

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):415-418 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The wrong reasons: A response to Michael Krausz.Robert Stecker - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (4):418-421.
Goldman on interpreting art and literature+ reply to Stecker.Alan Goldman - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (3):246-247.
Is constructivism floored? Reply to Stecker.Philip Percival - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (1):82–86.
Artistic Value and Sentimental Value: A Reply to Robert Stecker.Julian Dodd - 2013 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 71 (3):282-288.
Interpretation and Its Objects: Studies in the Philosophy of Michael Krausz.Andreea Deciu Ritivoi - 2005 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (4):388-390.
The Idea of Creativity edited by krausz, michael, denis dutton and karen bardsley.Phil Jenkins - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):186-188.
Rightness and Reasons: Interpretation in Cultural Practices.Thomas Leddy - 1993 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (2):222-225.
Response to Stecker.Alan Goldman - 1991 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 49 (3):246-247.
Robert Stecker, Interpretation and Construction: Art, Speech, and the Law.David Davies & Julie Van Camp - 2004 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 62 (3):291-296.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
48 (#322,453)

6 months
14 (#254,536)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references