Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 3 (1):3-18 (2009)
AbstractAt IAPS Ljubljana conference (September 2007) Dag Vidar Hanstad and Sigmund Loland presented a paper on elite-level athletes' duty to provide information on their whereabouts, to decide between two opposing positions: is this WADA demand justifiable anti-doping work or an indefensible surveillance regime? They concluded that on moral grounds this regime is conditionally acceptable, the condition being the acceptability of a general framework and objectives embodied in anti-doping global legislative foundations (the World Anti-Doping Code). But, as they said, principled objections against the system have more universal relevance, which has to be taken seriously . To take this ambiguous and intriguing conclusion a step further, I propose a legal rather than ethical approach, from the aspect of constitutional and international human rights law, and the possible clash of two legally acknowledged values - the concept of elite sport without doping, and the concept of individual human rights. This conflict between ideological or moral values and the legality of individual rights is not a novelty. This paper presents three instances of this conflict: Bernard de Mandeville's differentiation between public and private values; Eug ne Sue's parallel legal and civil morals; and the contemporary moralisation of law which conflates legality into morality. The subordination of legality to morality has potentially dangerous consequences: here, Agamben's 'state of exception' comes to mind, with his analysis of potestas and auctoritas. However, in the case of sport and the war against doping, the origin of power is not in the nation state; it originates in civil society's non-governmental national and international bodies recognised as autonomous sources of legal order
Similar books and articles
Philosophy on Steroids: Why the Anti-Doping Position Could Use a Little Enhancement.Brent M. Kious - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):213-234.
Current Anti-Doping Policy: A Critical Appraisal. [REVIEW]Bengt Kayser, Alexandre Mauron & Andy Miah - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):2.
Genetic Technologies and Sport: The New Ethical Issue.Andy Miah - 2001 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 28 (1):32-52.
Citation, Please Cite the Printed Work: Miah, A. (2006) Rethinking Enhancement in Sport, in Bainbridge, W.S. & Roco, M.C. 'Progress in Convergence: Technologies for Human Wellbeing.' Annals of The. [REVIEW]Andy Miah - unknown
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Ungrounding Homo Ludens: On Agamben and Modern Sports.Sandra Meeuwsen - 2021 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 16 (3):318-332.
Juridical and Ethical Peculiarities in Doping Policy.M. J. McNamee & L. Tarasti - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (3):165-169.
Making Visible the Invisible Act of Doping.Martin Hardie - 2014 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 27 (1):85-119.
Philosophical Kinanthropology (Philosophy of Physical Culture, Philosophy of Sport) in Slavonic Countries: The Culture, the Writers, and the Current Directions.Ivo Jirásek & Peter M. Hopsicker - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (2):253-270.
References found in this work
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Ulrich Beck, Mark Ritter & Jennifer Brown - 1993 - Environmental Values 2 (4):367-368.
The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits.Bernard Mandeville - 1732 - Liberty Classics.