Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):211-228 (2008)
Abstract |
Biomedical research has increased in magnitude over the last two decades. Increasing number of researchers has led to increase in competition for scarce resources. Researchers have often tried to take the shortest route to success which may involve performing fraudulent research. Science suffers from unethical research as much time, effort and cost is involved in exposing fraud and setting the standards right. It is better for all students of science to be aware of the methods used in fraudulent research so that such research can be detected early. Biomedical research is one area that seems to have attracted maximum numbers of fraudulent researchers; hence this article devotes itself to biomedical research scenario.
|
Keywords | Research misconduct Unethical research Biomedical research Scientific misconduct Fabrication Falsification Plagiarism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10805-008-9068-6 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.Robert King Merton - 1973 - University of Chicago Press.
The White Bull Effect: Abusive Coauthorship and Publication Parasitism.L. S. Kwok - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):554-556.
Suppression of Scientific Research: Bahramdipity and Nulltiple Scientific Discoveries.Toby J. Sommer - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (1):77-104.
Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences.Pitirim A. Sorokin - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):82-83.
Fads and Foibles in Modern Sociology and Related Sciences.Piritim A. Sorokin - 1957 - British Journal of Educational Studies 6 (1):84-86.
Citations of this work BETA
Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications.Maarten van Wesel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):199-225.
Enhancing the Taxonomies Relating to Academic Integrity and Misconduct.Loreta Tauginienė, Inga Gaižauskaitė, Salim Razi, Irene Glendinning, Shivadas Sivasubramaniam, Franca Marino, Marco Cosentino, Alla Anohina-Naumeca & Julius Kravjar - 2019 - Journal of Academic Ethics 17 (4):345-361.
Predicting Self-Reported Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in University Students Using an Augmented Theory of Planned Behavior.Camilla J. Rajah-Kanagasabai & Lynne D. Roberts - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy.Alex Mabou Tagne, Niccolò Cassina, Alessia Furgiuele, Elisa Storelli, Marco Cosentino & Franca Marino - 2020 - Journal of Academic Ethics 18 (2):193-205.
Selected Ethical Issues in the Analysis and Reporting of Research: Survey of Business School Faculty in Malaysia. [REVIEW]June M. L. Poon & Raja Azimah Ainuddin - 2011 - Journal of Academic Ethics 9 (4):307-322.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Two Models of Models in Biomedical Research.Hugh LaFollette & Niall Shanks - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (179):141-160.
Protecting People in Research: A Comparison Between Biomedical and Traffic Research. [REVIEW]Sara Svensson & Sven Ove Hansson - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):99-115.
An Introduction to Research Ethics.Paul J. Friedman - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (4):443-456.
Non-Human Primates: The Appropriate Subjects of Biomedical Research?M. Quigley - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (11):655-658.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
53 ( #212,121 of 2,498,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,788 )
2009-01-28
Total views
53 ( #212,121 of 2,498,788 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #421,542 of 2,498,788 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads