"Is," "ought," and the autonomy of ethics

Philosophical Review 79 (4):493-509 (1970)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2184290

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,612

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Defining the autonomy of ethics.Frank Jackson - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (1):88-96.
The morality that ought to be.A. L. Hodder - 1894 - Philosophical Review 3 (4):412-428.
Hume on "is" and "ought".A. C. MacIntyre - 1959 - Philosophical Review 68 (4):451-468.
How not to derive "ought" from "is".James Thomson & Judith Thomson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):512-516.
Moral rules and the analysis of "ought".W. J. Rees - 1953 - Philosophical Review 62 (1):23-40.
`Ought' conversationally implies `can'.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1984 - Philosophical Review 93 (2):249-261.
The British Moralists and the Internal ‘Ought’. [REVIEW]Charlotte Brown - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):299-302.
How to derive "ought" from "is".John R. Searle - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (1):43-58.
The Theory and Practice of Autonomy.Laura Waddell Ekstrom - 1993 - Philosophical Review 102 (4):616.
Autonomy and Self-Respect.Martina Herrmann - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (4):736.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#74,842)

6 months
8 (#1,326,708)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David R. Kurtzman
University of Maryland, College Park

Citations of this work

How to Prove Hume’s Law.Gillian Russell - 2021 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 51 (3):603-632.
Is, Ought, and the Regress Argument.Jacob Sparks - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):528-543.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references