The problem of dogmatism

The Philosophers' Magazine 44 (44):36-41 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s rejection of philosophical theories doesn’t mean that he, or whoever adopts his method, couldn’t have any positive views about the objects of philosophical investigation. It merely means not presenting those views in a dogmatic manner, as theses that all relevant cases must fit. Wittgenstein’s approach allows one not to take sides in philosophical disputes and to take on board whatever might be correct in the traditional theories.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Transcendental arguments and the problem of dogmatism.Oskari Kuusela - 2008 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (1):57 – 75.
Wittgenstein’s Method of Philosophical Analysis.L. Bishwanath Sharma - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:223-235.
The problem of other minds: Wittgenstein's phenomenological perspective.Søren Overgaard - 2006 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (1):53-73.
Wittgenstein’s Thought in Transition. [REVIEW]John Koethe - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):727-730.
Kant's Treatment of Animals.Alexander Broadie - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (190):375-383.
Wittgenstein’s circle.Genevieve Lloyd - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 38:57-59.
Kant's Treatment of Animals.Alexander Broadie & Elizabeth M. Pybus - 1974 - Philosophy 49 (190):375 - 383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
70 (#239,830)

6 months
4 (#862,833)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Oskari Kuusela
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references