Mind 108 (431):503 - 538 (1999)
There is as yet no settled consensus as to what makes a term a logical constant or even as to which terms should be recognized as having this status. This essay sets out and defends a rationale for identifying logical constants. I argue for a two-tiered approach to logical theory. First, a secure, core logical theory recognizes only a minimal set of constants needed for deductively systematizing scientific theories. Second, there are extended logical theories whose objectives are to systematize various pre-theoretic, modal intuitions. The latter theories may recognize a variety of additional constants as needed in order to formalize a given set of intuitions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Logical Operations and Invariance.Enrique Casanovas - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (1):33 - 60.
Logical Form: Classical Conception and Recent Challenges.Brendan Jackson - 2006 - Philosophy Compass 1 (3):303-316.
Similar books and articles
A Characterization of Logical Constants is Possible.Gila Sher - 2003 - Theoria 18 (2):189-198.
New Intuitionistic Logical Constants and Novikov Completeness.Alexander Yashin - 1999 - Studia Logica 63 (2):151-180.
Understanding the Logical Constants and Dispositions.Corine Besson - 2009 - The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 5 (1):1-24.
The Problem of Logical Constants.Mario Gomez-Torrente - 2002 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):1-37.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads128 ( #35,354 of 2,146,284 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #185,113 of 2,146,284 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.