To specialize or to innovate? An internalist account of pluralistic ignorance in economics

Synthese 191 (11):2499-2511 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Academic and corporate research departments alike face a crucial dilemma: to exploit known frameworks or to explore new ones; to specialize or to innovate? Here I show that these two conflicting epistemic desiderata are sufficient to explain pluralistic ignorance and its boom-and-bust-like dynamics, exemplified in the collapse of the efficient markets hypothesis as a modern risk management paradigm in 2007. The internalist nature of this result, together with its robustness, suggests that pluralistic ignorance is an inherent feature rather than a threat to the rationality of epistemic communities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Economics of Ignorance or Ignorance of Economics?Paul Davidson - 1989 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 3 (3-4):467-487.
A DDL Approach to Pluralistic Ignorance and Collective Belief.Carlo Proietti & Erik J. Olsson - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):499-515.
Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution.Paul Hoyningen-Huene - 2008 - Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Policy Recommendations as Spurious Predictions: Toward a Theory of Economists' Ignorance.Adam Fforde - 2011 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 23 (1-2):105-115.
Paradigm Shifts, Scientific Revolutions, and the Unit of Scientific Change: Towards a Post-Kuhnian Theory of Types of Scientific Development.Paul C. L. Tang - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:125 - 136.
What is Ignorance?Rik Peels - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (1):57-67.
What Kind of Ignorance Excuses? Two Neglected Issues.Rik Peels - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (256):478-496.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-25

Downloads
64 (#184,693)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rogier De Langhe
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

The Diffusion of Scientific Innovations: A Role Typology.Catherine Herfeld & Malte Doehne - 2019 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 77:64-80.
Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Nickles - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
The Role of the Priority Rule in Science.Michael Strevens - 2003 - Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):55-79.

View all 6 references / Add more references