The Limits of Conceptual Analysis in Aesthetics

Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 21 (39) (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In order to understand why analytic aesthetics has lost a lot of its former intellectual stature it is necessary to combine historical reconstruction with systematic consideration. In the middle of the twentieth century analytic philosophers came to the conclusion that essentialist theories of the “nature” of art are no longer tenable. As a consequence they felt compelled to move to the meta-level of conceptual analysis. Then they tried to show how a purely classificatory concept of art is used. The presupposition, however, that there actually is such a concept can only appear plausible at first sight. Upon closer inspection it turns out to be utterly misguided



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual Art Is Not What It Seems.Dominic McIver Lopes - 2007 - In Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.), Philosophy and conceptual art. New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy and conceptual art.Peter Goldie & Elisabeth Schellekens (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The limits of conceptual analysis.Laura Schroeter - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):425-453.
Essence and anti-essentialism about art.Lauren Tillinghast - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (2):167-183.
Concepts and conceptual analysis.Stephen Laurence & Eric Margolis - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (2):253-282.
Entertainment: A question for aesthetics.Richard Shusterman - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (3):289-307.
Emotion in aesthetics.Warren A. Shibles - 1995 - Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Is the self of the infant preserved in the adult?Eva Mark - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (3):347-353.
Introduction to aesthetics: an analytic approach.George Dickie - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The proper province of philosophy.Justin Sytsma - 2010 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3):427-445.


Added to PP

75 (#225,106)

6 months
8 (#411,508)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The role of theory in aesthetics.Morris Weitz - 1956 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1):27-35.

Add more references