International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):325 – 335 (2006)
This paper advances a general argument, inspired by some remarks of Davidson, to show that appeal to meanings as entities in the theory of meaning is neither necessary nor sufficient for carrying out the tasks of the theory of meaning. The crucial point is that appeal to meaning as entities fails to provide us with an understanding of any expression of a language except insofar as we pick it out with an expression we understand which we tacitly recognize to be a translation of the term whose meaning we want to illuminate by the appeal to assigning to it a meaning. The meaning drops out as irrelevant: the work is done, and can only be done, by matching terms already understood with terms they translate.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Propositions and Higher-Order Attitude Attributions.Kirk Ludwig - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5):741-765.
Lepore and Ludwig on 'Explicit Meaning Theories'.Miguel Hoeltje - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 165 (3):831-839.
Similar books and articles
Literal Meaning, Conventional Meaning and First Meaning.C. J. L. Talmage - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):213 - 225.
Truth and Meaning.Robert C. Cummins - 2002 - In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. pp. 175-197.
Particular and General: Wittgenstein, Linguistic Rules, and Context.Daniel Whiting - 2010 - In The Later Wittgenstein on Language. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Asymmetrical Dependence Between Causal Laws Does Not Account for Meaning.Alberto Voltolini - 1998 - In V. Abrusci (ed.), Prospettive della Logica e della Filosofia della scienza. ETS. pp. 307-316.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads86 ( #60,900 of 2,172,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #172,512 of 2,172,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?