- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest in Surrogate Decision Making: Why Ethics Committees Should Assign Surrogacy to a Separate Committee
Journal of Clinical Ethics 9 (3):273-290 (1998)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Defining financial conflicts and managing research relationships: An analysis of university conflict of interest committee decisions.Elizabeth A. Boyd & Lisa A. Bero - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (4):415-435.
The Role, Remit and Function of the Research Ethics Committee — 5. Collective Decision-Making and Research Ethics Committees.Sarah Jl Edwards - 2011 - Research Ethics 7 (1):19-23.
Research, ethics and conflicts of interest.M. Little - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (3):259-262.
Family dynamics and surrogate decision-making.Lisa Soleymani Lehmann - 2012 - In D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (eds.), Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy.Jennifer Damelio & Kelly Sorensen - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (5):269–277.
Ethics education and value prioritization among members of U.s. Hospital ethics committees.Adrian Bardon - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):395-406.
Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers.M. M. Tieu - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (3):171-175.
Informed consent, shared decision-making, and the ethics committee.Randall Horton & Howard Brody - 2012 - In D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (eds.), Guidance for healthcare ethics committees. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Conflict of interest: The importance of potential.Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Religious Values and Medical Decision Making.Toby L. Schonfeld - 2008 - In Micah D. Hester (ed.), Ethics by committee: a textbook on consultation, organization, and education for hospital ethics committees. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 133.
Conflict of interest: the importance of potential. [REVIEW]Dr Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Conflicts of interest: challenges and solutions in business, law, medicine, and public policy.Don A. Moore (ed.) - 2005 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
On the significance of the prior of a correct decision in committees.Ruth Ben-Yashar & Shmuel Nitzan - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (3):317-327.
Deciding for a child: a comprehensive analysis of the best interest standard. [REVIEW]Erica K. Salter - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (3):179-198.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
13 (#1,029,095)
6 months
4 (#779,649)
2014-01-20
Downloads
13 (#1,029,095)
6 months
4 (#779,649)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The definition of adequate care in externally sponsored clinical trials: The terminological controversy about the concept “standard of care”.Hans-Jörg Ehni - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):123-130.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-659b74868d-xgg89 uwo