Manual versus speech motor control and the evolution of language

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (1):197-198 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Inferences made from endocasts of fossil skulls cannot provide information on the function of particular neocortical areas or the subcortical pathways to prefrontal cortex that form part of the neural substrate for speech, syntax, and certain aspects of cognition. The neural bases of syntax cannot be disassociated from “communication.” Manual motor control was probably a preadaptive factor in the evolution of humansyntactic ability, but neurophysiological data on living humans show that speech motor control and syntax are more closely linked. The evolution of fully modern speech occurred fairly recently; thoughHomo habilismay have had some degree of speech and syntactic ability, it was not fully modern. Stone tools are uncertain indices of language or cognition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroanatomical structures and segregated circuits.Philip Lieberman - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (4):641-641.
Hand-to-hand combat, or mouth-to-mouth resuscitation?Michael C. Corballis - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):242-250.
The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production.Peter F. MacNeilage - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):499-511.
Unbalanced human apes and syntax.Roger S. Fouts & Gabriel Waters - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):221-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
33 (#500,331)

6 months
15 (#185,003)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations