Powers and Nomic Relations: Powerful Categoricalism and the Dualist Model

Philosophia 51 (3):1401-1423 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The bulk of the literature concerning the governing role of non-Humean laws has been concentrated on the alleged incapability of higher order nomic facts to determine the regularities in the behaviour of actual objects, the so-called Inference Problem. Most recently Ioannidis, Livanios and Psillos (2021) argue that an adequate solution to the Inference Problem requires an answer to the question of how nomic relations manage to ‘tell’ properties what to do. Ioannidis et al. dub the difficulty that all extant accounts of governing laws face to give such an answer, the Governing Problem and introduce a Dualist Model, according to which the specific behaviour of things in the world is the outcome of both the thin powers things have to be subjected to laws, and certain nomic features of the world. The aim of this paper is to show that the most plausible form of the Dualist Model can provide the basis for a novel version of the Powerful Qualities View about properties. To this end it presents ways of developing two aspects of the Dualist Model. It defends the view that nomic relations must be relata-specific in order to play their theoretical role within the Model and provides arguments for the view that natural properties should have the minimum (compatible with the core tenets of the Model) modal strength.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,098

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Only Powers Can Confer Dispositions.Gabriele Contessa - 2015 - Philosophical Quarterly 65 (259):160-176.
Humean Supervenience Debugged.David Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.
The dispositionalist conception of laws.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (4):353-70.
Bird against the Humeans.Harold W. Noonan - 2010 - Ratio 23 (1):73-86.
Nomic Inversion And The Contingency Of Laws.Simon Bostock - 2005 - Philosophical Writings 30 (3).
The Dretske–Tooley–Armstrong theory of natural laws and the inference problem.Joan Page`S. - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227-243.
Can bare dispositions explain categorical regularities?Tyler Hildebrand - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):569-584.
The Dretske-Tooley-Armstrong theory of natural laws and the inference problem.Joan Pag - 2002 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):227 – 243.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-02-04

Downloads
42 (#390,669)

6 months
21 (#133,716)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vassilis Livanios
University of Cyprus

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
New work for a theory of universals.David K. Lewis - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):343-377.
What is a Law of Nature?D. M. Armstrong - 1983 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.
The Universe as We Find It.John Heil - 2012 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1993 - Philosophical Perspectives 7:429-440.

View all 55 references / Add more references