Film and Philosophy 18:164-183 (2014)

Responds to the seminal claim of Bruce Russell that films cannot present philosophical arguments. Provides a reading of The Tree of Life (Terrence Malick, 2011) in order to illustrate how this film presents an environmental ethics argument. Some reference to the environmental philosophy of Holmes Rolston III as well as Martin Heidegger.
Keywords Terrence Malick  Martin Heidegger  Holmes Rolston III  Environmental Ethics  Bruce Russell
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/filmphil20141811
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Phenomenological Preconditions of the Concept of Film-as-Philosophy.Shawn Loht - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Phenomenology 2 (2):171-185.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Thin Red Line.David Davies (ed.) - 2008 - Routledge.
The Philosophical Limits of Film.Bruce Russell - 2000 - Film and Philosophy:163-167.
Film's Limits: The Sequel.Bruce Russell - 2008 - Film and Philosophy 12:1.


Added to PP index

Total views
13 ( #741,734 of 2,445,471 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #87,822 of 2,445,471 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes