Helen Longino
Stanford University
Biological research on aggression is increasingly consulted for possible answers to the social problems of crime and violence. This paper reviews some contrasting approaches to the biological understanding of behavior—behavioral genetic, social-environmental, physiological, developmental—as a prelude to arguing that approaches to aggression are beset by vagueness and imprecision in their definitions and disunity in their measurement strategies. This vagueness and disunity undermines attempts to compare and evaluate the different approaches empirically. Nevertheless, the definitions reveal commitments to particular metaphysical views concerning behavior. Alternative understandings of aggression suggest even different research approaches than those most commonly found in the literature
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/s0039-3681(01)00020-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,398
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Commentary.Michael M. Burgess - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):363-366.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Difference Mechanisms: Explaining Variation with Mechanisms.James Tabery - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):645-664.
Making Sense of the Nature–Nurture Debate. [REVIEW]James Tabery - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (5):711-723.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Do We Measure When We Measure Aggression?E. H. - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):685-704.
Evidential Support and Undermining: Revision of Håkan Törnebohm's Theory of Confirmation. [REVIEW]Harald Dickson - 1990 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 21 (1):163-182.
Strong Measure Zero Sets Without Cohen Reals.Martin Goldstern, Haim Judah & Saharon Shelah - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (4):1323-1341.
New Hope for Shogenji's Coherence Measure.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2011 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):125-142.
Adding One Random Real.Tomek Bartoszyński, Andrzej Rosłanowski & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (1):80-90.
Finding Measure in Exceeding Measure.William Desmond - 2001 - Ethical Perspectives 8 (4):319-331.
Shakespeare's "Measure for Measure".D. J. Snider - 1875 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (3):312 - 325.
6. An Opposing Worldview: Transient Morality in Shakespeare's Measure for Measure and Machiavelli's Mandragola.Andrea Ciliotta-Rubery - 2003 - Logos. Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica [Universidad Complutense de Madrid, España] 6 (2).
Finite Powers of Strong Measure Zero Sets.Marion Scheepers - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (3):1295-1306.
Gunk, Topology and Measure.Frank Arntzenius - 2004 - In Dean Zimmerman (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaphysics: Volume 4. Oxford University Press.
On Universal Semiregular Invariant Measures.Piotr Zakrzewski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1170-1176.


Added to PP index

Total views
60 ( #168,713 of 2,420,558 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #351,163 of 2,420,558 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes