Episteme 3 (7):261- 272 (1998)

Authors
Pablo Lorenzano
Freie Universität Berlin (PhD)
Abstract
The aim of the present communication is to contribute to the discussion about the existence of laws in biology. In order of it the argumentation of J.J.C. Smart against their existence and the discussion of it made by M. Ruse and R. Munson are first reconstructed. The examination of this controversy shows that, despite of the differences between the first of the authors mentioned and the other two in relation to the problem of laws in biology, the three share the assumption according to which in the case that there are laws (in strict sense or fundamental) in genetics, they must be some of the so-called “Mendel’s laws”. In the present communication, and from a revision of the metascientific concept of fundamental law, the above assumption is questioned, proposing an alternative analysis, based on a structuralist reconstruction of genetics.
Keywords Scientific Law  Fundamental Law  Genetics  Smart  Ruse  Munson  Mendel’s Laws  Rational Reconstruction  Metatheoretical Structuralism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,682
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
32 ( #308,680 of 2,349,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #510,673 of 2,349,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes