Attunement in the Modern Age

Human Studies 32 (1):19-31 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This contribution starts from Max Scheler’s claim that modern philosophy holds two differing views on feelings. The first view, which Scheler attributes to René Descartes, presents them in their intentional role but rejects their independence; the other view, which Scheler attributes to Immanuel Kant, holds that they cannot be reduced to the rational part of the soul and thus affirms their independence, but deprives them of all cognitive powers. After considering both views, I discuss the views of Franz Brentano and Edmund Husserl. Husserl takes an ambivalent approach to attunement, which opens the possibility of understanding Martin Heidegger’s thought of fundamental attunement.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The foundation of phenomenological ethics: Intentional feelings.Wei Zhang - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (1):130-142.
Commitment and attunement.Craig DeLancey - 2014 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (4):579-594.
Movement and meaning.Roald Tone Boldsen Sofie Køppe Simo - 2024 - Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy 11 (2):315-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-20

Downloads
24 (#646,648)

6 months
5 (#837,836)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1788 - New York,: Hackett Publishing Company.
Critique of judgement.Immanuel Kant - 1911 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Nicholas Walker.

View all 18 references / Add more references