The Applicability of the Planck Length to Zeno, Kalam, and Creation Ex Nihilo

Philosophia Christi 19 (1):171-180 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are good reasons to think there is a universal, fundamental length, specifically, at the order of the Planck length. If this holds, we then have an empirical answer for Zeno’s paradox of Achilles and the tortoise, a potential impasse in the second premise of the kalam cosmological argument, and creation ex nihilo. In this paper, I establish metaphysical, empirical, and epistemic reasons suggesting there is a universal, fundamental length. Along the way, I propose a “contingent necessity” for such a notion. I then detail how a universal, fundamental length is a preferred solution for issues –.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Four conceptions of creatio ex nihilo and the compatibility questions.Pirooz Fatoorchi - 2010 - In David B. Burrell, Carlo Cogliati, Janet M. Soskice & William R. Stoeger (eds.), Creation and the God of Abraham. Cambridge University Press.
Spontaneous creation of the universe ex nihilo.Maya Lincoln & Avi Wasser - 2014 - Physics of the Dark Universe 2 (4):195-199.
How to Create a Physical Universe Ex Nihilo.Richard C. Potter - 1986 - Faith and Philosophy 3 (1):16-26.
Creatio Ex Nihilo and the Literal Qur’ān.Abdulla Galadari - 2017 - Intellectual Discourse 25 (2).
Ex nihilo.Paul Clavier - 2011 - Paris: Hermann.
Deconstruction and creation: an Augustinian deconstruction of Derrida.Mark Cauchi - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (1):15-32.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
36 (#441,732)

6 months
9 (#302,300)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brent Lyons
Biola University

Citations of this work

Finitism in geometry.Jean-Paul Van Bendegem - 2002 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references