‘Father knows best’: Therapy as entertainment

Pragmatics and Society 5 (2):296-316 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper examines two realisations of the television talk show in North America: The Oprah Winfrey Show and Dr. Phil, looking specifically at how they function within the sub-genre of ‘therapeutic talk show’ in keeping with Livingstone and Lunt’s (1994) classification of talk shows. Talk shows are defined by Ilie (2001) as “semi-institutional discourse” having features of a given setting (TV studio), topic- and goal-oriented talk, high degree of topic control, as well as restrictions on time and turn-taking. Theorists examining this sub-genre of therapeutic talk show have argued that it provides a valuable means by which stories otherwise unrecognized have a forum, or that values of truth and honesty can be conveyed (Livingstone & Lunt 1994; Masciarotte 1991; Carbaugh 1988). However, theorists such as Abt and Seesholtz (1994) view therapeutic talk shows as potentially demeaning to guests who appear on them as well as a means by which suffering can be trivialized. Through an examination and analysis of requests for information, both direct and indirect, which are the principal features of all interviews, I look at how Oprah Winfrey and Dr. Phil problematize the narratives told by their guests. Both hosts rely heavily on one type of request, B-Event assertions functioning as indirect requests for information, to provoke specific response. My findings indicate that these talk shows do not in fact provide a forum for talk that would otherwise not be considered as suggested by Livingstone and Lunt (1994). Both Oprah Winfrey and Dr. Phil appropriate the stories provided by their guests; they also participate in their own overarching meta-narrative whereby as ‘heroes’ they solve their guests’ problems within a given time frame. Guests’ narrative responses share more with the speech act of confession than with free self-expression. The speech act of confession encouraged by these therapeutic talk shows serves in turn to reinforce conservatively-held values on the part of the at-home audience for whom such confession is also entertainment

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,963

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Self-talk and Self-awareness: On the Nature of the Relation.Alain Morin - 1993 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 14 (3):223-234.
Entitled to Speak: Talk in the Classroom. [REVIEW]Christine Doddington - 2001 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (3):267-274.
Toward a bestial rhetoric.Debra Hawhee - 2011 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (1):81-87.
'It's good to talk'?Sandra E. Marshall - 2001 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101 (2):129–144.
Beyond Turn-taking.Ivar Solheim - 2002 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 4 (2):19-37.
Talk about talk about talk about art.Allan Shields - 1967 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (2):187-192.
Truth as a Pretense.James A. Woodbridge - 2005 - In Mark Eli Kalderon (ed.), Fictionalism in Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 134.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-08-30

Downloads
22 (#709,861)

6 months
3 (#978,111)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Relevance.D. Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986 - Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 2.
13. On the Pragmatics of Answers.Ferenc Kiefer - 1988 - In Michel Meyer (ed.), Questions and questioning. New York: W. de Gruyter. pp. 255.

Add more references