Ikonografická a štrukturalistická analýza ako dve možné východiská estetickej interpretácie pravekého umenia

Espes 5 (1):13-32 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The most often and discussed issue in the analysis of prehistoric art is the problem of interpretation and the problem of understanding of prehistoric artistic artifacts. There are a lot of approaches, but the most popular from the aesthetic and artistic point of view is the interpretation of meaning of prehistoric art. In the present paper we would like to discuss the productivity of iconological and structuralism approach, especially in the interpretation of Celtic art from the area of Slovakia with application on the statue of a boar. The main problem is the existence of Celtic myth in the written form, which allows us to understand mythological meaning, but also confuses us because of the apocryphal characteristics of this “tales”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Constitution and kind membership.Michael C. Rea - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 97 (2):169-193.
Philosophy, Myth and Plato's Two-Worlds View.Eugenio Benitez - 2007 - The European Legacy 12 (2):225-242.
Myth and Poetry in Lucretius.Monica R. Gale - 1994 - Cambridge University Press.
A grounding solution to the grounding problem.Noël B. Saenz - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (8):2193-2214.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-02-28

Downloads
9 (#1,252,744)

6 months
1 (#1,469,946)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Interpretation in art.Gregory Currie - 2003 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 291--306.
Pojem celku v teorii umění.Jan Mukařovský - 1968 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 5:173-181.

Add more references