An Ethical Interpretation of the Nash Choice Rule

Theory and Decision 49 (2):151-157 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides an ethical intepretation of the Nash choice rule. In a setting in which (cardinal) utilities are interpersonally comparable, this procedure is characterised by an impartiality requirement and by the assumption that choices are not responsive to the agents' relative ability to convert resources into utility

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1023/a:1005234101607

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Nash implementation via mechanisms that allow for abstentions.Jianxin Yi - 2021 - Theory and Decision 91 (2):279-288.
Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution.Christopher D. Proulx - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (1-2):1-2.
Rational Cooperation and the Nash Bargaining Solution.Michael Moehler - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):577-594.
What price compromise?John Bone, John D. Hey & John Suckling - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (3):359-376.
Nash meets Samuelson: the comparative-statics interpretation of Nash equilibrium.Marek Hudik - 2022 - Journal of Economic Methodology 30 (2):122-134.
A new monotonicity condition for tournament solutions.İpek Özkal-Sanver & M. Remzi Sanver - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (3):439-452.
An extension of the Nash bargaining problem and the Nash social welfare function.Mamoru Kaneko - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (2):135-148.
On arguments from self-interest for the Nash solution and the Kalai egalitarian solution to the bargaining problem.Luc Bovens - 1987 - Theory and Decision 23 (3):231-260.
Implementation without rationality assumptions.Ville Korpela - 2012 - Theory and Decision 72 (2):189-203.
Nash Bargaining Theory, Nonconvex Problems and Social Welfare Orderings.Vincenzo Denicolò & Marco Mariotti - 2000 - Theory and Decision 48 (4):351-358.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
7 (#1,413,139)

6 months
50 (#92,477)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Some formal models of grading principles.Patrick Suppes - 1966 - Synthese 16 (3-4):284 - 306.
Interpersonal comparisons of utility: Why and how they are and should be made.Peter J. Hammond - 1991 - In Jon Elster & John E. Roemer (eds.), Interpersonal comparisons of well-being. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 200--254.

Add more references