Interpersonal comparisons of well-being

New York: Cambridge University Press (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this volume a diverse group of economists, philosophers, political scientists, and psychologists address the problems, principles, and practices involved in comparing the well-being of different individuals. A series of questions lie at the heart of this investigation: What is the relevant concept of well-being for the purposes of comparison? How could the comparisons be carried out for policy purposes? How are such comparisons made now? How do the difficulties involved in these comparisons affect the status of utilitarian theories? This collection constitutes the most advanced and comprehensive treatment of one of the cardinal issues in social theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of psychological research.J. D. Keehn (ed.) - 1982 - New York: Pergamon Press.
Teaching Ethics: Cambridge Conference Proceedings, 1989-1993.Rosamund M. Thomas (ed.) - 1993 - Centre for Business and Public Sector Ethics.
Social justice in the ancient world.K. D. Irani & Morris Silver (eds.) - 1995 - Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
Method and speculation in Hegel's Phenomenology.Merold Westphal (ed.) - 1982 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
86 (#189,229)

6 months
9 (#235,983)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prioritarianism: A response to critics.Matthew D. Adler & Nils Holtug - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (2):101-144.
Decision Theory.Katie Steele & H. Orri Stefánsson - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Distributive justice.Julian Lamont & Christi Favor - 2012 - In Peter Adamson (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 24 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references