Ethical Gerrymandering in Science

Journal of Animal Ethics 1 (2):119-121 (2011)

Abstract

Satz posed the term "legal gerrymandering for human interest," referring to the redrawing of the natural baseline of protections for other animals to further human use of them. One of the domains where this exists most clearly is in scientific research on animal models. An animal model is sufficiently like humans in anatomy, physiology, or psychology to be used in research considered too harmful or risky for humans. I argue that the use of animal models is, by its very nature, ethical gerrymandering and a corruption of the self-correcting component of the scientific process.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-02

Downloads
3 (#1,368,087)

6 months
1 (#386,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

The Recognition of Animal Sentience by the Law.Charlotte E. Blattner - 2019 - Journal of Animal Ethics 9 (2):121-136.
Commentary: A Belmont Report for Animals? Rights or Welfare?Lori Marino - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (1):67-70.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Redistricting in Japan: Lessons for the United States.Ray Christensen - 2004 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 5 (2):259-285.
Goodness, God, and Theological Gerrymandering.Joe E. Barnhart - 1982 - Philosophical Topics 13 (Supplement):31-37.
Science and Ethics: Toward a Theory of Ethical Value.John R. Welch - 1994 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 25 (2):279 - 292.
A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science.Henriikka Clarkeburn - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (4):439-453.