Epistemic openness and perceptual defeasibility [Book Review]

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):441-448 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

original Martin, Michael (2001) "Epistemic Openness and Perceptual Defeasibility". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63(2):441 - 448

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brewer, direct realism, and acquaintance with acquaintance. [REVIEW]Richard Fumerton - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):417-422.
Sensory experience, epistemic evaluation and perceptual knowledge.Emmett L. Holman - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (September):173-187.
On the distinction between perceptual and ordinary beliefs.J. Barry Maund - 1977 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (December):209-219.
Is perceptual content ever conceptual?Michael R. Ayers - 2002 - Philosophical Books 43 (1):5-17.
Appearing as irreducible in perception.Alan H. Goldman - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (December):147-164.
Replies.Bill Brewer - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (2):449-464.
Dreams, Perception, and Creative Realization.Katie Glaskin - 2015 - Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (4):664-676.
Perception and Normative Self-Consciousness.Maxime Doyon - 2015 - In Maxime Doyon & Thiemo Breyer (eds.), Normativity in Perception. New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 38-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
196 (#112,032)

6 months
20 (#201,986)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael Martin
University of California, Berkeley

Citations of this work

Perception and content.Bill Brewer - 2006 - European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):165-181.
Perception and conceptual content.Alex Byrne - 2013 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Blackwell. pp. 231--250.
Reasons for Belief.Hannah Ginsborg - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):286 - 318.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references