A Hard‐line Reply to Pereboom’s Four‐Case Manipulation Argument 1

Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):142-159 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,045

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-16

Downloads
39 (#398,761)

6 months
8 (#505,181)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The objects of moral responsibility.Andrew C. Khoury - 2018 - Philosophical Studies 175 (6):1357-1381.
What Makes a Manipulated Agent Unfree?Chandra Sekhar Sripada - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3):563-593.
Free actions as a natural kind.Oisín Deery - 2021 - Synthese 198 (1):823-843.

View all 66 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Unprincipled virtue—synopsis.Nomy Arpaly - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (3):429-431.
Defending hard incompatibilism.Derk Pereboom - 2005 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 29 (1):228-247.
Responsibility and manipulation.John Martin Fischer - 2004 - The Journal of Ethics 8 (2):145-177.

View all 10 references / Add more references