Robustness, control, and the demand for morally significant alternatives: Frankfurt examples with oodles and oodles of alternatives

In David Widerker & Michael McKenna (eds.), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Ashgate. pp. 201--217 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,774

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The limits of limited-blockage Frankfurt-style cases.Michael Robinson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (3):429-446.
When is an alternative possibility robust?Simon Kittle - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):199-210.
Robustness and up-to-us-ness.Simon Kittle - 2017 - Disputatio 9 (44):35-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-28

Downloads
69 (#82,832)

6 months
12 (#1,086,452)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael McKenna
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

Free will.Timothy O'Connor & Christopher Evan Franklin - 2018 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Compatibilism.Michael McKenna - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Actual Sequences, Frankfurt-Cases, and Non-accidentality.Heering David - 2022 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 65 (10):1269-1288.

View all 29 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references