Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, Vol. 2 (2010)

Jukka Mikkonen
Tampere University
In analytic aesthetics, a popular ‘cognitivist’ line of thought maintains that literary works of fictional kind may ‘imply’ or ‘suggest’ truths. Nevertheless, so-called anti-cognitivists have considered the concepts of implication and suggestion both problematic. For instance, cognitivists’s use of the word ‘implication’ seems to differ from all philosophical conceptions of implication, and ‘suggestion’ is generally left unanalysed in their theories. This paper discusses the role, kinds and conception of implication or suggestion in literature, issues which have received little attention in contemporary literary aesthetics. In the first part, the author shall examine classic views on implication in literature and introduce objections to the views. In the latter part, in turn, the author shall propose a definition of the ‘literary suggestion’ and discuss issues related to its interpretation.
Keywords implication  suggestion  literature  fiction  cognitivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,795
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logical Status of Fictional Discourse.John R. Searle - 1975 - New Literary History 6 (2):319--32.
Artworks: Definition, Meaning, Value.Robert Stecker - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 56 (3):311-313.
Art, Intention, and Conversation.Noël Carroll - 1992 - In Gary Iseminger (ed.), Intention and Interpretation. Temple University Press. pp. 97--131.
Intention and Interpretation: A Last Look.Jerrold Levinson - 1992 - In Gary Iseminger (ed.), Intention and Interpretation. Temple University Press. pp. 221--56.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

You Don't Say! Lying, Asserting and Insincerity.Neri Marsili - 2017 - Dissertation, University of Sheffield

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #231,520 of 2,438,733 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,612 of 2,438,733 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes